With the excitement of the Tour de France, I have found
my own interest in cycling renewed. Last weekend, I gave my bike a quick
service, cleaning and re-greasing the chain, pumping up the tires. It’s amazing
what a little work can do to increase efficiency (and thus fun) when it comes
to riding a bike.
This morning, for the first time since fatherhood, I managed
to cycle all the way up Cumnor Hill without stopping. Smug with my victory, I
began to wonder if Cumnor Hill would register as a ‘climb’ in the Tour de
France. So, I did a bit of quick research.
As it turns out, there are no hard and fast rules for how
climbs are classified in the Tour, or in cycling in general. That said, there
are guidelines for comparing the length of the climb versus the average
slope that give you a pretty good idea.
Using free, online maps (which may or may not be
completely accurate), I was able to determine that my climb up Cumnor hill is
about 2.25km (approx. 1.4 miles) long with a gain in elevation of around 68 meters (approx.
223 feet). This gives an average slop of just over 3% (Is that it!?! In truth the first part of the climb is much stepper than the second half.)
To measure a climb in the cycling world, you multiply the
average slope (3) by the length in meters (2250) to get a score (6750). To qualify as a ‘Category 4’ climb, the lowest level climb in the Tour, the
lowest score needed is 8000. So, my
climb, unfortunately, doesn’t even make it onto the chart. If it were another
400 meters long, I’d get the badge, although another 400 meters might also
finish me off…
As a side note, all the playing around with maps made me
realize that my ride to work is actually longer than I thought, slightly over 8
miles as compared to the 7.5 I thought. I’ve been short-changing myself a mile
every time!
No comments:
Post a Comment